Deleted member 19900
Guest
- Thread starter
- #1
Delete
Sponsored
Last edited by a moderator:
Article didn't even both linking to the original source which seems to on par for the sh*tty XXXXXauthority sites. Mostly empty fluff pieces that are often incorrect (GM Authority is a laughing stock on Lyriq and Hummer news)."The Ford Mustang Mach-E, by comparison, ranked seventh on this list after spending 66.7 days on lots, which is 1.3 times the segment average."
https://fordauthority.com/2023/11/ford-mustang-mach-e-among-slowest-selling-used-evs/
Wow Land Rovers are really that cheap? had no ideaArticle didn't even both linking to the original source which seems to on par for the sh*tty XXXXXauthority sites. Mostly empty fluff pieces that are often incorrect (GM Authority is a laughing stock on Lyriq and Hummer news).
![]()
I saw an updated list as this is a few months old. Majority of the slowest selling vehicles are Stellantis products and EVs.
Not dealerships, clearly.What gives?
The difference between trade-in value and resale prices is how dealerships stay in business. As ever it has been.The thing that jumps out at me after thinking about this is folks on the forum have been talking about how dealers are offering them something like $23k for their MME trade-ins, but this is saying an average of $42,503k for resale.
What gives?
No they're not.Wow Land Rovers are really that cheap? had no idea
Hey now, I happen to enjoy reading Fordauthority and GMauthority.Article didn't even both linking to the original source which seems to on par for the sh*tty XXXXXauthority sites. Mostly empty fluff pieces that are often incorrect (GM Authority is a laughing stock on Lyriq and Hummer news).
![]()
I saw an updated list as this is a few months old. Majority of the slowest selling vehicles are Stellantis products and EVs.
Emphasis on the word “used.”No they're not.
MSRP for 2024 Discovery Sport is 18k more than listed on that article. So if they got that wrong what else did they screw up?